Domino 9 und frühere Versionen > ND6: Entwicklung

readers field doesn't works properly ?

<< < (2/5) > >>

Semeaphoros:
It may or may not work with abreviated names, usually it does not.

Are you sure, that it has been abbreviated before and was not only displayed in the abbreviated form? This is very usual practice with readernames and author-fields

Toma Bogdan:

--- Zitat von: Semeaphoros am 08.06.04 - 16:04:33 ---Are you sure, that it has been abbreviated before and was not only displayed in the abbreviated form? This is very usual practice with readernames and author-fields

--- Ende Zitat ---
I am sure. I use the sytax name/OrgUnit/Organization and it works !

Hernan Cortez:

--- Zitat von: Toma Bogdan am 08.06.04 - 17:48:26 ---
--- Zitat von: Semeaphoros am 08.06.04 - 16:04:33 ---Are you sure, that it has been abbreviated before and was not only displayed in the abbreviated form? This is very usual practice with readernames and author-fields

--- Ende Zitat ---
I am sure. I use the sytax name/OrgUnit/Organization and it works !

--- Ende Zitat ---
As far as I remember the abbreviated form gets converted automatically when you type them in an editable field or use abbreviated form in formulas for computed fields.
You might check the properties box for the document, to see if you find something strange there.

Axel

Semeaphoros:
Yes, usually it does, if you don't overwrite that behaviour, and hence it is saved as canonical and not abbreviated. But it does not, if you fill the fields directly in the backend-document by LotusScript

Toma Bogdan:

--- Zitat von: Semeaphoros am 08.06.04 - 19:30:35 ---Yes, usually it does, if you don't overwrite that behaviour, and hence it is saved as canonical and not abbreviated. But it does not, if you fill the fields directly in the backend-document by LotusScript

--- Ende Zitat ---
so the best thing I should do is to modify the readers field with LS to get the canonical values, isn't it ?

Navigation

[0] Themen-Index

[#] Nächste Seite

[*] Vorherige Sete