Prima, danke.
Ich habe jetzt nochmal mithilfe deines Links gesucht.
Mal der Text den ich gefunden habe:
CATALOG.NSF, EVENTS4.NSF, STATREP.NSF, and ADMIN4.NSF, databases which are built automatically by Notes when the server starts up, have Replica IDs which are related to the Replica ID of NAMES.NSF.
EXAMPLE:
NAMES.NSF has a Replica Id of: 852564AC:004EBCCF
CATALOG.NSF has a Replica Id of: 852564AC:014EBCCF
EVENTS4.NSF has a Replica Id of: 852564AC:024EBCCF
ADMIN4.NSF has a Replica Id of: 852564AC:034EBCCF
STATREP.NSF has a Replica Id of: 852564AC:044EBCCF
Notice that the similarity is in the last six (6) characters of the Replica ID (4EBCCF in this example). The distinguishing characters are the first two (2) characters of the unique part of the Replica ID (01, 02, 03, 04 in this example). For example:
852564AC:044EBCCF
MAIL.BOX, also built automatically upon server startup, has a randomly generated Replica ID, unrelated to that of NAMES.NSF, as does CERTLOG.NSF, which must be built manually.
In R5, only the ADMIN4.NSF and CATALOG.NSF Replica IDs are similar to the NAMES.NSF Replica ID. This differs from V4 where EVENTS4.NSF and STATREP.NSF were also similar.
In R5, you may also notice that the Replica IDs of the following databases are similar to one another (but not necessarily similar to the NAMES.NSF):
LOG.NSF
STATREP.NSF
STATMAIL.NSF
REPORTS.NSF
CERTSRV.NSF
With these five databases, all but the last four (4) characters are identical. For example:
LOG.NSF Replica ID is 852567F5:003C3954
STATREP.NSF Replica ID is 852567F5:003C8D04